When this name was registered, the LoAR listed his name without the locative. As it is on all of his forms as well as the notification of registration letter sent to him later, we have restored the locative.
When this badge was registered, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When this badge was registered, the decision text on the LoAR was clear that this is a badge, not a device. The LoAR neglected to note in the action type that it was a badge, so we are clarifying that now.
When this name change was registered, the LoAR misspelled the previous name as Jean Honnête le Bouq_iniste.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When her device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. The submitter's previous device, Per pale vert and sable, a Catherine's wheel and an oak leaf, a chief triangular argent, is retained as a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per pale sable and gules, a frauenadler displayed with human arms maintaining in chief two swords argent, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per pale indented purpure and Or, a fountain between two bears combattant counterchanged, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. The submitter was contacted and requested that the previous device, Ermine, a falcon rising contourny, wings addorsed, belled and jessed gules and a chief vert, be released.
Listed when registered on the LoAR as a name change from Innis McCothas, there is no evidence that name was ever registered. We are correcting the action type to a new name and device.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per pale vert and argent, an open book between three Celtic crosses counterchanged is retained as a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Or, a needle bendwise threaded sable, a chief embattled vert, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per fess purpure and vert, two bendlets and two scarpes fretted, in pale three thistles in pale Or, is released.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the Letter of Intent, the previous device, Azure, ermined, a fox courant and on a chief indented argent, three celtic crosses azure, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Sable, a dolphin haurient between two flaunches Or, each charged with a Maltese cross fitchy sable, is retained as a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Or goutty de sang, three cups sable, is retained as a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
Originally reblazoned on the April 2010 LoAR, that reblazoning was corrected in an errata in July 2010. However, the original and the errata both erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge. We are choosing to only errata the most recent errata action to correct the inaccurate item type.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When reblazoned, the LoAR erroneously listed this as a device instead of a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Or, a rose and on a chief invected vert three compass stars Or, is retained as a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Azure, three roundels and a demi-sun issuant from base Or, is retained as a badge.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Azure, a phoenix Or issuing from flames gules within an orle of fleurs-de-lys argent, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note this was a device change instead of a new device. This was a resubmission of the same design from a previous return for conflict; while this submission form was merely marked as a resubmission, not a change, the original form was marked as a change and to release the old device. The submitter was contacted and reaffirmed the desire to release the old device. Therefore, the previous device, Per pale Or and sable, two dogs rampant addorsed counterchanged, breathing flames gules, on a chief nebuly azure an egg between two acorns Or, is released.
When this device change was registered, the LoAR neglected to note the disposition of the previous device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Argent, between three mullets azure a rampion stalk (Campanula rapunculus) proper, is retained as a badge. The LoAR also misspelled the byname, which we are correcting here.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per pale gules and vert, a stag trippant and on a chief argent three Bowen knots vert, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Argent, two arrows in saltire surmounted by a feather vert, a bordure embattled purpure, is released.
When this device was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change, not a new device. Per the instructions on the form, the previous device, Per chevron engrailed azure and argent, three elder flowers argent barbed and seeded Or and a tree proper, is retained as a badge.
When this was registered, the LoAR neglected to note it was a device change. The disposition of the previous device, Vert, an acorn Or in chief three mullets argent, was listed on the LoAR; it was retained as a badge.
Created at 2020-01-24T18:12:24